01Gallery Catalogue Deck

A focused collection can change how a programme is understood

Harbor Index Office | 2025 public-image collection proposal

Fictional decision scenario | evidence pending
Gallery Catalogue Deck01 / 09
02Gallery Catalogue Deck

The decision starts with evidence, not assumed outcomes

  1. Define the proposed collection focus
  2. Identify the material needed to assess it
  3. Set a shared review process
  4. Agree on funding conditions
Gallery Catalogue Deck02 / 09
03Gallery Catalogue Deck

A focused release is the proposal, not a proven result

This fictional scenario contains no verified submissions, reach, reuse, or review-time data. Any outcome claim needs a source.

Gallery Catalogue Deck03 / 09
04Gallery Catalogue Deck

Four criteria can guide the next selection

Visible subject

Choose one subject that contributors can interpret and audiences can recognise.

Image context

Require a caption, creator credit, date, and usage rights for each selected image.

Editorial fit

Record why each image belongs in the proposed release.

Shared decision

Ask editors and programme leads to assess one documented shortlist.

Gallery Catalogue Deck04 / 09
05Gallery Catalogue Deck

The next release needs an image with traceable context

Image slot: proposed release subject. Asset, creator, date, rights, and caption [needs source].

Gallery Catalogue Deck05 / 09
06Gallery Catalogue Deck

Compare two review approaches before committing funds

Separate review

  • Teams assess submissions independently
  • Selection reasons remain in separate records
  • Image context may need to be reconciled later

Shared shortlist

  • Teams assess the same candidate images
  • Selection reasons are recorded together
  • Captions and rights are checked before approval
Gallery Catalogue Deck06 / 09
07Gallery Catalogue Deck

A proposed pilot can test the shared process

Define

Agree on one subject and written selection criteria.

Collect

Request candidate images with captions and rights information.

Review

Hold one cross-team shortlist meeting and record decisions.

Assess

Compare the pilot against an agreed baseline before further funding.

Gallery Catalogue Deck07 / 09
08Gallery Catalogue Deck

Funding depends on evidence the review can verify

No performance figures or attributed testimony were supplied. Treat this as a proposed decision framework, not a report of achieved results.

  • Confirm the current submission and approval baseline [needs source].
  • Confirm image usage rights and creator credits [needs source].
  • Agree on success measures before the pilot begins.
Gallery Catalogue Deck08 / 09
09Gallery Catalogue Deck

Fund the next release around one visible subject and one shared review

  1. Approve a scoped pilot, subject to an agreed budget
  2. Name the joint review owners and selection criteria
  3. Release further funds only after the evidence review
Gallery Catalogue Deck09 / 09